2 Sides 2 Every Story When It Comes 2 Prince

Prince. Photo: Kevin Mazur Copyright WireImage.com/NPG Records 2011

Prince. Photo: Kevin Mazur Copyright WireImage.com/NPG Records 2011

So, Prince is getting ready to embark on a European tour that actually kicks off with dates in Canada this weekend.  For the European tour, Prince did 3 interviews we are told.  2 of them at the same time.  1 was with the Guardian and Le Parisian both interviewing him at the same time.

The Guardian had quoted Prince…or mis-quoted….as it did not go into detail of what his answer or answers were.  Since Prince does not allow recording devices, this does some times happen.  We are running what the Le Parisian wrote as it is more detailed and has more length to Prince’s answers to the questions he was asked;

We almost fainted when he heard on the phone: “It’s for tomorrow. Get ready. “A few days before his unique concert at Stade de France on June 30, Prince is visiting Paris. And he wanted to talk. The incredible news – we have not slept all night – will be confirmed: “Be there at 19.00 hours.(7pm)

Not allowed to record anything. If he likes you, you have time. “Go to a selected restaurant near the Champs-Elysees. Feverish, we are led into an empty room upstairs. An hour passes. Suddenly, Prince appears. Alone, without bodyguards or entourage. Smiling, all in black, a silver chain around his neck, he tends a firm handshake, apologizes for being late, asks “How are you? “And” What’s there fun to do tonight in Paris?  “Sits on the bench, ordering a green tea,” Go, discussions. ”

You played at the Zenith, Bercy, the Parc des Princes. Stade de France … is the missing one from your list of conquests?

Prince. The thing is, I have a group of incredible quality. It’s like a basketball all star team: each one is a champion in their field. When we play together, there is such an overflow of energy it takes at least a stadium/stage to greet it.

What will the show look like on 30th June?
“There will be many surprises. What I can tell you is that by playing in New York and Los Angeles it resulted in a very controlled show. This stage is at the end.”

We know that you rehearse a lot. How do you work with your group?
“I love being a tyrant (smile). But with love. I ask from them a very high level of excellence, but they are also perfectionists.”

What do you remember of the 1980’s?
“Michael (Editor’s note: Jackson) and I appeared at a time when there was nothing. On MTV, there was nothing. People dressed like they were going to the supermarket. We were the exceptions.”

Are you nostalgic for that time?
“Sometimes yes. Sometimes I see the shirts/clothes that I was wearing. But musically, no. I play more guitar, I sing better, I am a better arranger.”

Are you working on a new album?
“I no longer records songs. I do not want to record as long as the crisis in the music industry will not be resolved. No one earns money. I’ll go to the White House to discuss with the government the issues on copyright. It’s the Wild West. Everything must be clean.”

But you had been one of the first artists to use the Internet …
“Yes, but at that time, we made money.”

You very early on went to war against the record companies …
“A record company boss told me, straight in the eye: “But, Prince, you do still believe that our goal is to make you earn money? “I was accused of distributing my album” Planet Earth “with an English newspaper, but it allowed me to reach 2 million people. I fought for control over my records. From there, no one dictated to me what I should do.”

Is it true that you have hundreds of songs in your files?
“That’s true. I listen to some of them with my band and they give me feedback on them.”

What do you do between concerts/shows/gigs?
“I study. I learn. I like to talk to people. In all the countries I go to, I meet the people. For example I’m going back to/returning to Morocco. I really like the Muslim culture. I don’t understand what people have against veiled women/women in bhurkhas. How can you stop people dressing how/the way they want to?”

The people you meet are they very intimidated by you?
“No, I am very easy to access. Here, for example, do you feel uncomfortable with me? No! Celebrity means nothing in reality, we are all the same.”

When you are in Paris, what do you do?
“I go out at night. During the day I can not. The days when I could still walk the streets without being harassed by the paparazzi are long gone.”

It seems/would appear you don’t like your songs being covered?
“First of all it’s lazy. Then/secondly its as if you’ve erased/ruined/wiped out the original version. This only happens only in music. Can you imagine if everybody did their own version of the Harry Potter film or book? Do you want to hear somebody else singing ‘Kiss’? Not me.”

You don’t have any wrinkles (you haven’t aged a bit), what’s your secret?
“Time is a spiritual thing (you’re as young as you feel). God doesn’t count the passing years. He doesn’t have any date of birth in the Bible. I don’t celebrate my birthdays any more. If you stay active, if you learn new things (keep learning), if you travel, then you stay young.”

2 interviews.  Done at the same time.  Yet, one has more fuller answers and more attention to detail.  Very interesting.  Was there an agenda?  I rather Prince talk about music and performances all day long.  It’s like watching Michael Jordan.  I care about his skills on the court.  Could care less that he loves McDonalds and wears Hanes underwear.  Calvin Kleins are softer Michael, just for the record.

So what do you all think happened here?  I am glad there was some clarification and not just sound bites.-Dr.FB

Diagnosis:  Whatever You Think….Is True

UPDATE:  The interviewer for the Guardian, Dorian Lynskey had this to say regarding the interview with Prince

Hi. I did the Guardian interview and had no sinister agenda at all. In fact I almost left out the line about burqas because I thought it might take too much attention from the rest of the piece (which it did), although this French Q&A also misrepresents that part of the conversation because the “How can you stop people dressing” bit was in response to a follow-up question about the French burqa ban, not about muslim countries.

Inevitably with two people taking longhand notes (one of whom is doing an interview in his second language) there will be differences. Some of the French version is definitely wrong – it was clearly “loving tyrant” not “I love being a tyrant”, for example. Equally, I can’t say for sure that I didn’t mishear or mistranscribe a few words. I wish I could have recorded it and checked every word myself. But nothing was deliberately fabricated. Please don’t assume that there has to be some weird agenda behind everything.

Michael Hann, the editor of the story for the Guardian contacted us as well:

Hi,
I’m the editor who commissioned the piece from Dorian. There’s a further issue that explains the indisputable differences between the Guardian’s interview and Le Parisien’s. Not only has their interview been conducted in a second language, and then translated into the writer’s mother tongue, it’s then been further translated back into English for the version that appears above. Anyone who’s ever played the game where you use web translation tools to take a favourite song lyric, translate it into another language, then back into English knows that the final result is unlikely to bear much relation to the original.
By the way, there is of course no circumstance in which a newspaper with an international readership in the tens of millions would compromise its journalism by taking an editorial line from a group of people on a fan site. It just doesn’t happen. As Dorian says, there was no agenda: we at the Guardian were as surprised as anyone by what he had to say.

Comments

comments

47 Comments
  • Anonymous
    Posted at 16:14h, 18 July

    Women don’t wear that garb because they want to, if they don’t they are beaten and sometimes thrown in prison.

  • MugginsMcSinewy
    Posted at 19:34h, 03 July

    Where to start?

    First of all, to address the claims of a conspiracy against Prince, motivated I assume by sinister forces on message boards who do not care for his recent recorded output, taken up by one of the most respected British newspapers, for what reason, exactly? To paint Mr. Nelson as an ill informed, conspiracy addled individual who is espousing morally and factually dubious solutions to his personal issues?

    I don’t know if you’re aware, but p’raps a trawl through his previous interviews would be in order. His views on Gays, his wacky insights into American history, current government policies concerning the deliberate aggravation of black neighbourhoods by means of chemicals sprayed from the air, have been stated many times by the man in question to several reputable publications, all of whom, I suppose are part of this plot to discredit a man who has been doing that himself for two decades, now.

    I have also noticed a tendency on certain discussion forums around this issue to be both outraged at the aspirations of the cabal of respected newspapers wishing to discredit a man for saying fractionally more stupid things than he has said in the past/in concert/ in interview/on film/ to his fans, and yet also tacitly endorsing it.

    “Of course Prince did not say this ill-informed piece of manipulation by those evil bods at the Guardian -probably don’t even believe in chemtrails, the shits- but ya know, if he *had* well that would have been an interesting spiritual/religious statement. We DON’T have enough order. Always letting us progress intellectually, as well as spiritually and emotionally and artistically, our man Prince.”

    As for the substance of his statements? Well, I don’t think it’s too much to consider them to be utterly contradictory, as to his professed beliefs in previous interviews – as to their only being one God, for instance – or for them to show a contemptible lack of knowledge as to where one state sanctioned ideology normally takes a country. That’s okay. We know he runs off at the mouth. We know he says dumb things. And have a good idea that the reasoning behind his disallowing recording equipment in situations like this is to be able to exercise “believable” deniability, and never have to really step to the plate and show that he is not merely taking the worst of the conspiracy addled, fringe religious nut-jobs that populate the extremely rich.

    His music *is* amazing. And I am of the opinion that he has turned out good music past the 1990s. But please. Let’s stop the charade. Let’s all disembark the Starship Enterprise and put on our universal translators. This is another sad entry into the decline of a once great artistic force. And let’s not pretend it’s anything but.

  • Friend
    Posted at 11:34h, 01 July

    So you would like people to believe there is no conspiracy against Prince because you say so? Just because you write it doesn’t mean it’s the truth. Do some research if you’re not afraid to find out the truth. Again I say there is a group of people trying to sabotage Prince and keep him from earning all the profits he’s entitled to.
    Michael Hann, don’t politely send me your “Very best wishes” after you’ve basically called me a conspiracy theorist.

    There are two types of people who call others conspiratorialists cowards: (1) Those who conspire
    (2) Cowards.

    This is something I quoted from Russ Tanner. You should check out his blog. Then, I recommend you go commission one of your seasoned journalist to get on the much needed articles about the Copyright Compulsory license scheme and the evil men do to the artist Prince.

    Sincerely,
    Friend

  • Michael Hann
    Posted at 02:55h, 01 July

    Dear Friend,
    I joined the fansite the day after our piece was published because I wanted to set the record straight concerning some of the wilder accusations about our journalism. I don’t see how my joining that site to post in response to our discussion about our journalism backs up any of your theories about a (non-existent) conspiracy.
    With very best wishes,
    Michael Hann

  • Chocolate_Box777
    Posted at 11:55h, 30 June

    I agree totally with “Friend”. Also a lot of peeps on that other site, bashes this site & its owner on the regular. U r very right about the moderators of that site to. Corrupt! is the exact word to describe them.

  • errant
    Posted at 11:29h, 30 June

    It is clear that you are completely unhinged, “Friend.” Seek counseling immediately.

  • Friend
    Posted at 11:05h, 30 June

    Michael Hann, in my opinion you’re a disgraceful liar. I see you joined that particular fan site on June 25, 2011, the day after Dr. Funkenberry posted the ‘2 Sides 2 Every Story When It Comes 2 Prince’. There is proof and I think you are acting like a manipulative, evil man. I doubt you were aware it would be documented in your profile, the date when you signed up, and how you would have to wait five (5) days (ha ha ha) before you could post anything on the fan site. It’s ironic how I, “Youknowwho”/”Friend” mentioned this same fan site on June 27, 2011 in my reply to journalist Doorian. Lynskey. It’s obvious to me you knew the debacle your newspaper was intentionally trying to create by sensationalizing Prince’s words, and this of course why you joined the fan site on the 25th. You want to lie and try to defend your crappy journalist and newspaper. Are you happy you were finally able to hurry and post more lies and lame excuses?

    Thank you for proving my point that you, your journalist, and newspaper are a part of the “sinister agenda” (Dorian Lynskey’s words, not mine.) against Prince. You are like the rest of the little group of trolls on that fan site. Many of the moderators are corrupt so they may quickly change the date or delete your profile to try to help you out. I’m well aware of how they get down on that fan site. This all proves to me that you were aware of the fan site. Fortunately for you, I am not a member of this corrupt site founded by Ben Margolin. Enjoy being a part of the hatefest Michael Hann. In my opinion, you people have no shame. I look forward to the day you all meet your karma.

  • Purple
    Posted at 14:23h, 29 June

    Even if the comments are cleared up by the journalists, the nutjobs over at a certain fan site won’t stop the hatefest and drama they created out of it.

  • FunkPunk
    Posted at 00:05h, 29 June

    @Friend, is that why your gangster banging online to reputable journalists? You’re moral high grounds must be far more magnanimous than we must all be able to comprehend.

    So classy.

    Poor Prince. I hope he ups the anty on his security to keep these psycho fans away from him. Deeply disturbing.

  • Friend
    Posted at 12:18h, 28 June

    In my opinion, Mr. Michael Hann commissioned the piece from his incompetent journalist but an editor with all his supposed power and authority can’t even get “Youknowwho” correct. I didn’t say your newspaper took or will ever take an editorial line from a fan site. Please read it again and get it straight. What I said is there twice (two times), in plain English. How about you and your seasoned journalist write an article on the Copyright Compulsory license scheme?

    Errant, I come with too much Power and Authority to be put in my place. This is why my words catch your attention, and like I told you on your blog, Tame never had this much swag and you know it. I’m no one’s fan (fanatic). That’s a role for your kind.

  • errant
    Posted at 09:25h, 28 June

    thank you, Michael Hann. it’s always refreshing when adults from the real world show up and put the Prince fans who have been sucked into the fantasyland vacuum inside of Prince’s brain in their place.

  • Michael Hann
    Posted at 09:14h, 28 June

    Hi,
    I’m the editor who commissioned the piece from Dorian. There’s a further issue that explains the indisputable differences between the Guardian’s interview and Le Parisien’s. Not only has their interview been conducted in a second language, and then translated into the writer’s mother tongue, it’s then been further translated back into English for the version that appears above. Anyone who’s ever played the game where you use web translation tools to take a favourite song lyric, translate it into another language, then back into English knows that the final result is unlikely to bear much relation to the original.
    By the way, YouNowWho and Friend, there is of course no circumstance in which a newspaper with an international readership in the tens of millions would compromise its journalism by taking an editorial line from a group of people on a fan site. It just doesn’t happen. As Dorian says, there was no agenda: we at the Guardian were as surprised as anyone by what he had to say.

  • Chocolate_Box777
    Posted at 00:33h, 28 June

    @ Dorian Lynskey
    Thx 4 clearing Ur side of the story. This is the first in Prince career that I’ve known a journalist to clear up a interview of Prince . U seem like a class act. So I will 4give U.
    This time…:-)

  • Daphne
    Posted at 00:32h, 28 June

    I always LOVE Prince interviews…..there is always something said that keeps me thinking late at night. Prince really is a wise and exciting man to listen to and watch whenever he graces the world with his presence. I didn’t find anything wrong with what he said…I agree with alot of what he said. Whenever I read an interview of his, I’m usually left smiling trying to imagine what this interview was like live. I like that this is more detailed and seems more factual. You really have to be careful with seedy journalist with an agenda…

  • Anonymous
    Posted at 23:32h, 27 June

    Thanks Dorian. Obviously you are a professional.

  • errant
    Posted at 20:16h, 27 June

    I bet you’re “Tame” aren’t you?

  • Friend
    Posted at 20:12h, 27 June

    Hey Prince, this is your Angel speaking. If Y-O-U happen to read this, please know that I feel deja vu (ha ha ha) is right about you needing proper PR and a manager (WIFE). After everything I’ve witnessed going on with some of the people close to you, I’ll straighten it all out for you, and I’ll do it at no charge because you really do have some VULTURES flying around you. You know how to reach me.

    With Love,
    Your Angel

  • Friend
    Posted at 19:27h, 27 June

    Never, and screw you. You’re the one who missed something. As far as “Music? Execs stealing from musicians?” I was being nice by not calling them DEVILS. Don’t bother replying because I’m done and I think people like you need to be extinct.

  • deja
    Posted at 18:40h, 27 June

    Screw you FRIEND. Dorian is a seasoned journalist. What part of PRINCE DOES NOT ALLOW ANY NOTETAKING OR RECORDING did you miss?

    Prince needs to hire a proper PR and MANAGER and fire all the fams in his s’crew’ because they do him a disservice.

    You can’t blame anyone but Prince for this crap.

    Music? Execs stealing from musicians? That model is upon extinction.

  • Prince al Festival del Jazz a Montréal: tre ore di vera musica « Prince@Music.Niga
    Posted at 14:48h, 27 June

    […] ha voglia di incidere nuovi dischi e le sue singolari dichiarazioni, in parete ridimensionate (Link http://www.drfunkenberry.com/2011/06/24/2-sides-2-every-story-when-it-comes-2-prince/) dopo l’intervista rilascita dal sito del The Guardian, non intaccano di certo la sua […]

  • Friend
    Posted at 11:51h, 27 June

    There’s clearly an agenda. All you need to do is read a few threads on a certain Prince fan site and you’ll see there’s a group of people deliberately trying to do damage to Prince in every way. These people don’t agree with Prince standing up for his rights as an artist/musician. Whether or not you’re a part of the “weird agenda” I don’t know. Many people are ignorant so they would rather insult Prince for saying something about veiled women in burqas than discuss why it is required for musicians to allow derivative works when it is not required of authors or sculptors? Why do greedy music executives get away with stealing from songwriters? If you want to be a better interviewer and you’re serious about your career, I suggest you learn shorthand Dorian Lynskey.

  • Youknowwho
    Posted at 11:19h, 27 June

    First, there’s clearly an agenda Dorian Lynskey. All you need to do is read a few threads at a certain fan site and you’ll see there’s a group of people deliberately trying to damage Prince in every way. They don’t agree with Prince standing up for his rights as an artist/musician. Whether or not you’re a part of the “weird agenda” I don’t know. Many people are ignorant so they’d rather insult Prince for saying something about veiled women in burqas than discuss and get answers as to why it’s required for musicians to allow derivative works but it’s not required of authors or sculptors? Why do greedy music executives get away with stealing from songwriters? Secondly, if you want to be a better interviewer and you’re serious about your career, I’d suggest you take a course in Shorthand.

Post A Comment